Les extrêmes se touchent ?
(Last modified 21 march 2007)
Differences, such as sex and gender differences, are stimulating
and exalting for those who are curious to explore and reveal differences.
A contrast in a matching way, being two identical but different,
clearly means something... there is something energetically functional
and necessary to it. In dancing tango, this subtle twinning is
the play. In some way, bodies who are dancing tango are revealing
differences equally. Some distance is needed for doing
what it takes to actualize an act of desire.
A romantic tanguero: Dancing tangos is like writing letters,
they are written to a certain particular other who responds...
and sometimes... the writing gets the shape of some sort of an
inspiring dialogue. A dialogue which happens between people, it
happens in the space between them, as in the space of a close
embrace on the dancefloor. So, letters are based on the existence
of distance... and the correspondence is crossing over the distances
between people, creating a dialogue. For a moment... they get
involved or mixed-up in the form of a conversation, a mutual interaction,
and interchanging. That can become stimulating and exalting to
the spirit, especially when the dialogue plays with tension, such
as the teasing tension between concealing and revealing, or the
tension between the risks and pleasures of expression and... trust.
Duality is typical for our western culture, it seems to
be an essential, delicious and addictive stimulus. It feeds the
imagination. Our imaginations need it to keep engaged. From a
narrative point of view, dramatic tension in a play starts when
there is a opposition of characters. Without a contradiction within
your action, a split, you can't develop a structure of motion.
An obstacle, a risk, makes the objective, the longing visible.
It can become overwhelming, like crossing an unmasking bridge,
crossing the contra-point, crossover and be exposed, willingly.
Contrast, the opposite, a contra-point is needed. A sandwich-mordida
is such a contra point. The woman trespasses the man's space and
makes her ganchos like a happy hooker.
Presumably, the position or energetic role of the macho
and the Ewig-Weibliche Tanguera is such an opposition
which is... energetically functional. It gives a dramatic tension
which results in art.
Some tango theater productions have a dramatic structure,
beside dance they tell a story. For example, the new musical Tanguera
tells the history of tango, it frames immigrants and Creoles,
ruffians and compadres, prostitutas and milongueros... all are
catched in a game of hope, disillusion and contradicting passions
that only the tango knows to reveal. It is the history
of a francesita that arrives in Argentina at the beginning of
20'th century, it is the lifestory of thousands of immigrants.
Astor Piazzolla's operetta María de Buenos
Aires tells another story....
Yo soy María
de Buenos Aires
de Buenos Aires María, no ven quién soy yo?
María Tango, María del arrabal,
María noche, María pasión fatal,
Maria del amor de
Buenos Aires soy
yo!
Yo soy María
de Buenos Aires
si en este barrio la gente pregunta quién soy,
pronto muy bien lo sabrán
las hembras que
me envidiarán,
y cada macho a mis pies
como un ratón
en mi trampa ha de caer.
Each macho at my feet
as a mouse
in my trap he has to fall.
Other, Illustrated Tango Reflections:
Dance
interpretations on Gallo Ciego
Walking
the tango rhythm
Walking
Seduction
Dance
is a physical need
Tangowals clips
vals Milena Plebs Ezequiel Farfaro
Online Tangolessen
videoclips videolessen updated
Carlos Gavito and Maria Plazaola
Showclips Forever Tango - great milongueros
Selected YouTube TangoVideos:
1. TangoClass - instructional vídeos - TangoLessons
2. Milonga and Candombe dancing
3. Tangovals clips - Tango waltzing - Valse - Tangowals
4. Various Great Tangoclips Online fast internet access needed
5. Fast Links to Selected Tango Dance Vidio Updates
6. Musicality & Humor in Tangodance - videoclips
Tango, Gender y Emancipación ...
Is tango macho or the Ewig-Weibliche?
Macho or the Ewig-Weibliche, how much have these
cliché "gender-concepts" changed since 1900?
Are images of tangodance only folkloric? Or do some see it now
through the gender's looking glass?
Gender: Culturally and socially constructed roles,
responsibilities privileges, relations and expectations of women
men girls and boys. Socially determined ideas which define what
roles and activities are appropriate for women and men, the power
to do or not to do things, leading or following. Sex
refers to the biological characteristics that categorise someone
as either female or male; whereas gender refers to the socially
determined ideas and practices of what it is to be female or male.
However, the value of the distinction between the terms
'sex' and 'gender' has been challenged more recently as 'sex'
has also been seen to be socially constructed, like a virtual
reality. Unreality seems today's cultural reality. Culture:
The distinctive patterns of ideas, beliefs, and norms which characterise
the way of life and relations of a society or group within a society.
Culture is sometimes interpreted narrowly as 'custom' or 'tradition',
and assumed to be natural and unchangeable. Despite these assumptions,
culture is fluid and enduring. Gender Mainstreaming:
An organisational strategy to bring a gender perspective to all
aspects of an institution's policy and activities, through building
gender capacity and accountability. Struggles against social inequalities
are good, and while we are equalizing the duties among all, people
look sexier than ever. Is it, as in the exiting origins of tango,
an empowerment approach?
Since the First World War, the social
field has much changed, especially the women's role. The 1914-18
War was so shockingly brutal, that a new sense of personal identity
was born. The masses started to reject the concept of privilege
as the reason for a better life. History of clothing puts social
appearances into view: Women stopped wearing jewellery and extravagant
clothes. Dress rules for both sexes were relaxed in theatres and
other venues. Women began to take part in voluntary work which
ultimately broadened their horizons and changed their outlook
forever. As women mixed with other classes, social barriers were
eaten away and the relaxed dress rules meant that they all began
to look similar. The effect of war on styles was that military
braiding, belts with buckles and shorter skirts were seen everywhere.
Clothes got shorter during the First World War out of practical
necessity.
After the war when women's dress became
more mannish, each year seemed to get more in contradiction with
the feminine woman beneath. Female clothes became looser and more
shapeless in fit. The bust was suppressed, the waist disappeared,
the shoulders became broader and hair shorter and shorter. The
"Modern Woman" was competitive, sporty, emancipated as well as
beautiful, and narrow boyish hips were preferred.
This new silhouette emphasised a flattened
chest and womanly curves were eliminated as the line became more
simplified. The slender flat chested tanned body and face of a
15 year old became the desired profile of the bright young things
of the Années Folles. Health and beauty clubs helped women
reshape their body profiles whilst getting fitter and healthier.
It was a difficult time for the previous leaders of fashion whose
style of dressing became as passé as their rounded figures
and older faces. More youthful women who could party all night
and carry the boyish fashions well were all the rage. Big busted
girls turned to bandaging their breasts flat, many adopted a bra
that could be laced at both sides and pulled and pulled in to
flatten the chest. As long as they looked boyish they looked fashionable.
The 1920's also saw a universal fashion for short hair a more
radical move beyond the curtain styles of the war era, which shocked
some older citizens, since hair had always been thought a woman's
crowning glory.
Once shoes began to be mass manufactured in the 1920s,
footwear became an essential fashion accessory. Now it was truly
visible beneath shorter dresses it needed to be selected with
more care and heels were over 2 inches high. During this Post
First War Epoque, there was an increased use of make up
and it was fashionable to perform the rites of make up in public.
Instead of disappearing to the powder room women got out their
engraved compact and applied lipstick and powder in sight of a
whole restaurant or nightclub or tearoom.
The Second World War redifined the gender
roles even more. As the men were at the front, the women were
needed for the economy. As war and disaster cleaned-up the old
habits of mind, the female participation in the work force pushed
the post-war economic production. First there was the booming
ecomonomy. The consequence was a kind of overactivity, being more
and more extreme lean and mean.
Today's "timespirit" expresses a certain "language"
to act like the others in society, a drive to uniformity. That
certain "language" or "La forza del destino",
can be related to self-objectification. It involves adopting a
third-person perspective on the physical self and constantly assessing
one’s own body in an effort to conform to the culture’s
appearance ideal. Objectification, the act of representing
an abstraction as a physical thing. Though portraying oneself
solely as an object to be looked at is sometimes viewed as exercising
control, presentation of the self in this way can be
viewed as a form of self-objectification. That is, they internalized
an observer’s standard of appearance and are engaged in
activities designed to enhance their sexual attractiveness. One
can say that a catwalk is not about interior feelings. Studies
have demonstrated that girls and women self-objectify more than
boys and men do. Objectification will not affect all individuals
equally, but certain situations that accentuate a person's awareness
of observers' perspectives on their bodies are likely to enhance
self-objectification. One group that might be expected to be particularly
high in self-objectification are dancers. Most of the dancer’s
time is spent in the studio where the mirror is omnipresent. The
dance room is incomplete without a mirror. The mirror is objective.
The mirror does not lie and it is a constant reminder to the dancer
of surveillance.
Of central importance to Objectification Theory, is that
objectification in our society influences people to internalise
the views present in society and to begin viewing themselves in
the same way. That is, girls and boys gradually learn to adopt
an observer's perspective on their physical selves and to treat
themselves as an object to be looked at and evaluated on the basis
of appearance. Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) term this particular
perspective "self-objectification," and describe it
as a form of self-consciousness that is characterised by habitual
and constant self-monitoring of one's outward appearance
to a prescribed ideal image. The constant monitoring of appearance
accompanying self-objectification has a number of negative behavioural
and experiential consequences. Internalising an observer's objectifying
perspective is incompatible with a creative, playful
or attentive state of mind. Further, habitual self-monitoring
of outward appearance results in a diminished awareness of internal
body states. The attention is turned away from the experience
as a living, inner experience. Selfobjectification diverts attention,
with people monitoring their own bodies as a reaction to (or in
anticipation of) the objectifying gaze of others (gaze anticipation).
In a society in which the individual is relentlessly confronted
with a massive cultural production of unattainable role models,
we find ourselves increasingly under pressure to conform.
The omnipresence of desirable bodies with luxurious lingerie
styling of the 1940's and the knowledge that we will never look
like that, creates a paradoxical and artificial web of frustration
and desire. This has created a completely new form of behavior
which Ariadne von Schirach calls "Der Tanz um die
Lust". Esthetic withdrawal, wrapped up in desirability. In
the past, women were supposed to be pretty and men successful.
Now, being young, attractive, verbal, intelligent and successful,
seems today for all to be the only way to be. The pressure to
satisfy and keep that goal, along with the insecurity and stress
it brings, is overwhelming. When looks are becomming extreme equal,
uniform, corresponding or matching, is not according a romantic
drive, but suspicious power. Differences, are stimulating and
exalting for those who are curious to explore and reveal differences.
Se questo è un uomo ?
Mas•cu•line,
a. [L. masculinus, fr. masculus male,
manly, dim. of mas a male: cf. F. masculin. See {Male}
masculine.]
1. Of the male sex; not female.
Thy masculine children, that is to say, thy sons.
--Chaucer.
2. Having the qualities of a man; suitable to, or
characteristic of, a man; virile; not feminine or
effeminate; strong; robust.
That lady, after her husband's death, held the reins with a masculine
energy.
3. Belonging to males; appropriated to, or used by, males.
Melina Sedo :
Women coming from holidays in Buenos
Aires often mention the frequency of men trying to get
friendly to them and one of the most important themes in argentine
Milongas seems to be the relations between men and women. And:
Tango lyrics mostly refer to men and women! But we non-argentine
only speak of tango!
Cultural differences?
Social differences?
Latin Lover ?
In Europe, USA and other non-argentine places tangueros and tangueras
seem to be mostly people with high school or university degree.
In my poll 136 of 170 tangueros had high school and 125 of them
university degree..
Well, most of the argentine tango-dancers coming to teach in Europe
and the milongueros in Buenos Aires are no university graduates.
And their approach to Tango and sexuality seems to be a little
more relaxed than ours, does it not?
Today one is more aware of the factual dangers
of expressions of sexuality then ever before, and the behaviors
don't seem to be changing and are actually getting worse. The
problem seems to stem from the way the message is being presented.
Most students report they are tired of being told in lecture format
what to do and what not to do. The same messages in the same format
have created a backwash of attitudes and behavior. Researchers
now tell us that what is needed are new ways of presentation.
To use dramatical presentations to explore behaviors, emotions,
and convictions common to college students challenged with decisions
concerning sexual behavior and their own sexual identity. The
program is designed to model behaviors, skills and attitudes that
are closely affiliated with healthy sexual decisions and relationships;
to confront sexual myths; and to assist in the formation of positive-enriching
rather than negative-destructive self-behaviors.
The masculine-feminine model, unlike the modern
unisex model, is based on the differences between men and women
- specifically, the power aspects of masculinity and femininity.
It recognizes the difference between what a man wants from a woman
and what a woman wants from a man.
The masculine-feminine modelling relationship is similar to the
relationship between a male leading and a female following relationship,
based on mutual understanding.
The man:
The man makes it possible for the woman to express her femininity
by taking responsibility for her.
He makes the major decisions, after consulting with his woman
provides the basic necessities - food, clothing, shelter, etc
- for his family
creates a structure - rules, routines, etc. - for his family
protects her from the 'masculine domain' (the business world)
protects his family from the dangers outside the home.
The woman:
the woman makes it possible for the man to express his masculinity
by giving him the authority to carry out his responsibility for
her.
But this society is changed for women nowadays,
and it’s changing for men ...
Partly, it’s the rise of feminism that has led many men,
and society as a whole, to rethink gender roles.
And partly, men’s perceptions of themselves and their place
in the world is being shaped by media images.
For several decades now, media critics and feminists alike have
been examining the role of the media in creating and reinforcing
stereotypical representations of women and femininity. But only
recently have they expanded the research to consider how the media
also construct, inform and reinforce prevalent ideas about men
and masculinity.
One of the most socially constructed stereotypes is that of gender.
Gender schema theory argues that people are socialized (e.g.,
through parents, teachers, peers, toys, and the popular media)
into believing that gender differences are significant and worth
maintaining . Although there is actually more variability within
than between the sexes, the concept of distinct and exclusive
gender differences persists nonetheless.
Tango commentators often allude or explicitly
refer to a female dancer attractiveness, emotionality, femininity,
and heterosexuality (all of which effectively convey to the audience
that her stereotypical gender role is more salient than her dancing
role), yet male tangueros are depicted as powerful, independent,
dominating, and valued.
This trivialization of tangueras is consistent with schema theory,
which proposes that people have implicit cognitive structures
that provide them with expectancies when processing information
.
Conversely, male tangodancers described as attractive were expected
to be perceived more negatively than would males not described
as such, because the gender schema for tangueros leads people
to expect that a man's dancing, rather than his physical attractiveness,
should be the focus.
Changes in thinking and attitudes toward sexual and gender identity
are taking place in society as a whole and within the sexual and
gender identity communities. The meanings of these words will
continue to change.
Because there is a slow but clear movement in society away from
thinking of most human behaviors as appropriate to one sex and
not appropriate to another but toward thinking of most human behaviors
as appropriate to both sexes and both genders, below some explanations
are listed as variability example.
For instance:
Sexual Identity and Gender Identity are similar in some ways and
very different in others. Both refer to how one thinks of a person.
The existence and perpetuation of gender and sexual identities
is based in the historic and continuing oppression of people do
not conform to certain aspects of society's gender roles.
Gender roles refer to the clothing, behaviors,
thoughts, feelings, relationships, etc., that are considered appropriate
or inappropriate for members of each sex.
However, sex, gender identity, and sexual identity refer to different
aspects of oneself.
Therefore, one may be any combination of sex (male/female), gender
(masculine/feminine), and sexual identity (straight, bisexual,
lesbian/gay.)
Gender identity refers to how one thinks of one's
own gender: whether one thinks of oneself as a man (masculine)
or as a woman (feminine.)
Society prescribes arbitrary rules or gender roles (how one is
supposed to and not supposed to dress, act, think, feel, relate
to others, think of oneself, etc.) based on one's sex (whether
one has a vagina or a penis.)
These gender roles are called feminine and masculine. Anyone who
does not abide by these arbitrary profiles may be targeted for
mistreatment.
Sexual identity refers to how one thinks of oneself
in terms of whom one is sexually and romantically attracted to,
specifically whether one is attracted to members of the same gender
as one's own or the other gender than one's own. When one's sex
and one's gender identity are different, one may base one's sexual
identity on either one. Alternatively, one may have two sexual
identities, one as a man and one as a woman.

Click for videoclips
F / M: Female / Male...
Used to specify the direction of a sex or gender role change.
Femme:
1. Feminine or effeminate dress and behavior, regardless of _sex_
or _gender identity_.
2. A sub-identity of lesbian or gay, based on masculine or macho
dress and behavior. (See _butch_.)
Female: One who has a vagina.
Female Impersonator (FI): A male who, on specific occasions, cross
dresses and employs stereotypical feminine dialog, voice, and
mannerisms for the entertainment of other people.
Feminine: The _gender role_ assigned to _females_.
Fetishistic Transvestite: A Transvestite who consistently eroticizes
Cross Dressing. May also eroticize fantasies of gender/sex change.
Gender (identity): A psychological _gender role_. _Masculine_
or _feminine_. Gender (identity) community: People who identify
as transvestite, transsexual, or transgendered, or as members
of the gender community.
Gender dysphoria (GD): Unhappiness or discomfort experienced by
one whose sexual organs do not match one's gender profile.
Gender neutral: Clothing, behaviors, thoughts, feelings, relationships,
etc. which are considered appropriate for members of both sexes.
Gender role: Arbitrary rules, assigned by society, that define
what clothing, behaviors, thoughts, feelings, relationships, etc.
are considered appropriate and inappropriate for members of each
sex. Some clothing, behaviors, etc. are considered appropriate
for members of both sexes. Which things are considered masculine,
feminine, or neutral varies according to location, class, occasion,
and numerous other factors. (See _masculine_, _feminine_, and
_gender neutral_.)
Girl: 1. A young female. 2. Colloquial term for _feminine_. Often
used to specify gender of clothes. ["My _girl_ clothes."] _Girl_
has often been used as a condescending term for a woman, and is
therefore distasteful to many people. (See _boy_.)
Hermaphrodite: One who has both a penis and a vagina.
Heterosexual (het): One who has significant sexual and romantic
attractions primarily to members of the other sex (than oneself.)
Derogatory terms include: breeder. (See _straight_.)
Heterosexism: The assumption or illusion that identifying as heterosexual
and having sexual and romantic attractions only to members of
the other sex (than oneself) is good and acceptable, and that
other sexual identities and attractions are bad and unacceptable.
The assumption that anyone is straight whose sexual orientation
is not known, usually coupled with a "blindness" to the existence
and concerns of LesBiGays.
Identity: How one thinks of oneself. One's internal
self, as opposed to what others observe or think about one. (Social
Label, Stigma)
Label: How someone else sees or thinks of one. To be seen or not
to be seen as such. Living in the eyes of the other.
But, there is also a sex difference in aggression
.
Males tend to show far more "direct" aggression such as pushing,
hitting and punching. Females tend to show more "indirect" (or
"relational", covert) aggression. This includes gossip, exclusion,
and bitchy remarks. It could be said that to punch someone in
the face or to wound them physically requires an even lower level
of empathy than a verbal snipe.
***
Nederlands:
Het woord Gender is bijna
niet te vertalen, maar het duidt op mannelijkheid en
vrouwelijkheid in een bepaalde betekenis: niet als biologische
gegevens (sekse / geslacht), maar als identiteit en sociale rol.
Gender is dan de sociaal-culturele rol die verwacht wordt van
mensen met een bepaald geslacht.
Dit brengt ons bij het belangrijke verband dat het 'aan de maatstaven
voldoen' heeft te maken met 's mans uiterlijk, sex appeal en intelligentie
en dit heeft dus weer te maken met (het hebben van) de penis (in
erectie).
Kortom,
er wordt een viriel soort mannelijkheid geconstrueerd. Een mannelijkheid
die te maken heeft met een gespierd lichaam, met ratio (zelden
tot nooit zul je in een schoonheidsbijlage in een vrouwenblad
lezen hoe je je intelligentie kunt verbeteren) en met potentie,
kracht en een soort woestheid.
Al deze eigenschappen worden bovendien gesteld als iets dat al
in elke man zit en enkel maar 'ontketend' hoeft te worden met
een wonderbra... Een essentialistisch idee over hoe 'de man' diep
van binnen in elkaar zou zitten. Mannen 'zijn nou eenmaal zo'
wild, krachtig, intelligent en stijlvol.
Maar wie in een openbare biblioteek op zoek gaat naar boeken over
man-vrouwverhoudingen vindt er titels als 'De oorlog tegen vrouwen',
'Vrouwen die teveel lief hebben', 'Liefde is geen mannenwerk',
'Een schrale troost: ervaringen van vrouwen met mannen', 'Vrijen
met mannen, kan dat?', 'Mannen... hopeloos', 'En nu is het uit:
over echtscheiding en vrouwenonderdrukking',...
Het profiel dat deze bestsellers oproepen is dat van domme, onbetrouwbare,
harteloze, ijdele en gewelddadige mannen tegenover intelligente,
empatische, gevoelige vrouwen met maar één slechte eigenschap,
namelijk dat ze 'veel te goed' zijn. Dit komt door het verlangen
van 'vrouwen' naar verzorging door een man. Dit is iets essentieels
van vrouwen en onafhankelijkheid van vrouwen lijkt een soort van
'contradictio in terminis'. Onafhankelijke vrouwen bestaan niet,
'to be taken care of' is wat vrouwen echt willen.
In het zoeken naar mannelijkheid komen vrouwen bij herhaling en
ter afwisseling twee typen tegen: de nieuwe man en de wildeman.
Beide typen zijn in Amerika 'uitgevonden'.
De nieuwe man is de zachtaardige, gevoelige man, die teder en
sterk tegelijk is. Het is de man die de 'vrouwelijke kant' in
zichzelf is gaan ontdekken. De wildeman is de man die in eenheid
met de natuur zijn innerlijke oerkracht heeft herontdekt. Dat
gebeurt idealiter met nachtelijke rituelen die ontleend zijn aan
de natuurvolken, en die samen met andere oermannen worden beleefd.
Maar het idee van mannelijkheid is kompleet inbeelding.
Carole Vance toont in haar artikel "Social construction theory
and sexuality". dat ook seksueel verlangen in feite een sociale
constructie is. 'Object choice' van een individu, ofwel zijn of
haar hetero-, homo- danwel biseksualiteit, is niet iets inherent
en intrinsiek aan het individu, maar is een historische en culturele
constructie. Zij stelt ook dat de geschiedenis van onze cultuur
laat zien hoe mannelijkheid iets is dat door mannen op hun weg
naar 'echte mannelijke volwassenheid veroverd ('acquired'), bereikt
('achieved') moet worden en waarin ze in ingewijd ('initiated
into') worden.
Sina-Aline Geißler constateert tenslotte in "How to Build
a Macho" dat mannelijkheid geconstrueerd wordt door middel van
sociale discoursen over "Lust en Unterwerfung" die alle culturele
uitingen beslaan, 'from music videos, poetry, and tangolyrics
to sports, beer commercials, and psychotherapy'.
Maar een culturele revolutie is nodig want ook de man onderdrukt
zichzelf zwaar. Vanuit zijn ideaal van mannelijkheid ontkent hij
een groot deel van zichzelf, met name het grootste deel van zijn
emoties.
Onzekerheden, angsten, verdriet, rouw, tederheid, liefde voor
een ander dan zijn vrouw (bv. vriendschappelijk houden van zonder
zweep), twijfel, behoefte aan lichamelijkheid, sex anders dan
neuken of met een ander dan zijn vrouw, zoals knuffelen met een
vriend, behoefte aan geborgenheid, gewoon knus in de zetel met
een dekentje en een koekje, veiligheid en bescherming... hij durft
al dit soort dingen nog niet eens tot zichzelf toe te laten, laat
staan dat hij ze naar een ander toe kan uiten. Een man leidt een
zeer leeg en zinloos leven.
Niet zelden ontbreekt echter bij mensen het vermogen (of de bereidheid)
om de beelden over mannen en vrouwen als een interpretatie van
de werkelijkheid te zien, in plaats van als de werkelijkheid zelf
!
Hier komt bij, dat de opvattingen over wat en hoe mannen en vrouwen
zijn, ook hun neerslag vinden in de wijze waarop mensen zichzelf,
als man of vrouw, zien en ervaren. Veranderingen in die opvattingen
raken daardoor dadelijk ook ons zelfbeeld op emotionele wijze.
Maar wat is beeldvorming in termen van mannelijkheid
en vrouwelijkheid ?
Het is het, impliciet of expliciet, bewust of onbewust, maken
van onderscheid tussen mannen en vrouwen, door het aan hen toeschrijven
van verschillende waarden en kwaliteiten, in gedrag, denkbeelden,
gevoelens, waardeoordelen en verwachtingen.
Met behulp van deze beeldvorming worden normen in stand gehouden
en opnieuw geproduceerd. Deze ideologie blijkt een ernstig belemmerende
factor te zijn voor het bereiken van gelijkheid tussen mannen
en vrouwen.
Voor de mechanismen waarmee het sekseverschil in stand wordt gehouden
zijn de termen "de macht van de vanzelfsprekendheid" en "de macht
van de dubbele moraal" geintroduceerd, zijnde: het systematische
verschil in waarneming, beoordeling, waardering, bejegening en
beleving van vrouwen en mannen (of het vrouwelijke en het mannelijke),
met als gevolg dat de bestaande asymmetrie in de orde tussen de
seksen wordt bevestigd.
Zolang mannen en vrouwen gezien blijven worden als dragers, respectievelijk
draagsters van de traditioneel aan hen toegeschreven waarden en
kwaliteiten, blijft de drang bestaan om dat verschil op de een
of andere manier in beeld te brengen.
Daarom zijn speerpunten nodig om het sociale
en culturele gedragspatroon van de man en de vrouw te doorboren
ten einde te komen tot de uitbanning van vooroordelen, van gewoonten
en van alle gebruiken, die zijn gebaseerd op de stereotype rollen
van mannen en vrouwen.
Het meer betrekken van mannen (in hetero-relaties) bij de opvoeding
van hun kinderen en een systematische domesticatie dient de gewenste
situatie waartoe het beeldvormingsbeleid ten slotte moet leiden,
is die waarin sekse geen rol meer speelt als maatschappelijk ordeningsbeginsel.
***
French:
Pour s'établir,
ce discours affirme que le mouvement des femmes a réalisé l'égalité
des sexes et que, grâce à la lutte menée par les féministes, en
quelques décennies les femmes ont rattrapé les hommes dans pratiquement
tous les domaines.
Elles auraient toutefois dépassé les limites de l'équité et relégué
les hommes au second rang, même dans les champs qui leur étaient
traditionnellement réservés. La situation entre les hommes et
les femmes serait donc totalement renversée au profit des femmes.
Voici deux exemples de ce genre de propos qui laissent entendre
que partout les filles ont déclassé les garçons.
Le premier extrait est tiré de l'article " Pitié
pour les garçons ", publié dans l'Actualité (février
1992), et le second est paru dans The Vancouver Sun (1er mars
2000) : " Être un homme n'est vraiment plus quelque chose
de très intéressant", constate un sexologue à la clinique de psychologie
Hochelaga et professeur à l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Aux
filles, tout semble désormais possible. On leur demande, on les
supplie même de faire une carrière scientifique. D'être pilotes
d'avion, pompiers, policiers. […] Pour les garçons, rien
ne va plus ! Ils semblent appelés à jouer désormais les seconds
violons. Être petit garçon semble complètement "out" aujourd'hui.
De plus en plus, la société québécoise n'en a plus que pour ses
filles, espoirs de demain, incarnations vivantes d'un monde meilleur
et d'un avenir radieux, alors que le garçon est dénoncé comme
l'héritier coupable de siècles de violence, de guerre et de destruction.
Homme ou femme, nous avons en nous même les
deux polarités, de même que nous avons des hormones masculines
et féminines.
Ces deux polarités s'attirent mutuellement, tels des aimants,
force électromagnétique erotique d'attraction qui maintient le
monde en forme jusque dans l'intimité atomique, en désir, sur
la vibration de l'amour.
Notre but commun est d'unir en soi ces deux polarités et l'autre
à l'extérieur m'y ramène irrémédiablement tel un miroir y conspirant,
cependant nos corps et nos circuits d'énergies sont différents.
Nous oublions qu'il y a aimantation entre le corps physique de
la femme et son propre animus psychique et celui de l'homme et
son propre anima, et le propre corps de l'homme ou de la femme
entre le pôle positif et le pôle négatif.
Et voilà que d'un seul coup, le portait a changé.
Le profil entier de la victime a changé de sexe. Les garçons piétinent,
disent les recherches. Dans toute l'Amérique du Nord, ils ont
du retard sur les filles dans la plupart des sujets. Ils abandonnent
plus jeunes l'école, ils sont accusés d'être à l'origine de la
flambée de violence dans les écoles, ils gobent Ritalin et Prozac
et ils se suicident à un rythme alarmant.
Et les filles ? C'est la vie en rose, depuis la maternelle
jusqu'aux études supérieures, écoles publiques ou privées, écoles
mixtes ou non - le monde leur appartient ".
Le message est clair, tout va terriblement mal pour les hommes.
Cette perte d'identité glisse facilement vers
le sentiment que le mâle lui-même est devenu inutile. Même son
rôle de reproducteur devient très aléatoire...
Dans le rapport amoureux, l'homme ne saurait plus comment se comporter
devant l'autre sexe, comment être un homme, et cela parce que
les femmes ne sauraient plus elles-mêmes ce qu'elles attendent
d'un homme, comme l'expriment cet extrait : " l'identité
masculine est touchée.
"Les gars disent : Que faut-il être : rose ?
Mauve ? Macho ? On ne sait plus ce que les
femmes veulent."
Les hommes et les femmes seraient aussi violents les uns que les
autres.
***
German: Geschlechterrollen im Argentinischen Tango
Melina Sedó :
Dazu wäre erst einmal die Frage zu klären,
was Macho eigentlich bedeutet.
Das spanische Wörterbuch gibt uns hier die Auskunft:
1. männlich,
2. Männchen (biologisch),
3. ganzer Kerl.
Nach Nau-Klapwijk (1999) wird in Argentinien mit diesem Begriff
ein Mann bezeichnet, der zwar in der Öffentlichkeit dominant auftritt,
sich jedoch über sein Verhältnis zur Frau definiert: er beschützt
und ehrt sie, er umwirbt und erobert sie. Damit übernimmt er eine
Rolle, die zwischen der eines Verführers und eines Vaters liegt.
„Ser macho bedeutet in Argentinien „Mann sein“, mit allen Privilegien,
aber auch allen Pflichten. In der Öffentlichkeit ist er der Chef.
Da gibt es keine Diskussion. Beide wissen das.
Aber „Mann sein“ heißt in Argentinien nicht nur eine Frau zu haben,
sondern auch für sie die Verantwortung zu tragen, sie zu schützen.
Ein Juwel im Leben, für das es sich lohnt, Tag und Nacht zu kämpfen:
Eine schöne Frau.
Und so ist der Machismo in Argentinien keineswegs verpönt. Im
Gegenteil: Ser macho ist ein auszeichnendes Attribut.“
Daß der argentinische Macho ein hauptsächlich öffentliches Phänomen
ist, bestätigen alle passionierten Argentinien-Reisenden: Zuhause
ist die Frau oft diejenige, welche die Verantwortung übernimmt
und „die Hosen anhat“ oder die den Mann leiden läßt.
Dieser Widerspruch kommt auch in zahlreichen Tangotexten zum Tragen.
Einerseits ist die Frau etwas, was „genommen“ wurde, andererseits
ist der Mann von der Frau abhängig. Gerade in der Frühzeit, wo
viele Einwanderer frauenlos oder getrennt von ihren Frauen nach
Argentinien kamen, blühte die Prostitution. Frauen waren ein Handelsgut,
das verkauft, gekauft und oft mit Gewalt genommen wurd. Sie mußten
sich in ihre Rolle fügen. (Schweizer, 1991)
Frauen waren Opfer, gänzlich passiv, die den Mann schmücken sollten
oder verkommen konnten: „Sie war nur eine Chromleiste am Nobelschlitten
eines Angebers“, sagt ein Tango.
Andere bezeichnen die Frau als „Sumpfblume“ , „Arme Dirne“ oder
„kleines Vorstadtmädel“.
Daneben gibt es ebenso zahlreiche Tangos, die den verlassenen
oder betrogenen Mann schildern, den, an dem sich die Frau gerächt
hat oder den, der von einem Konkurrenten ausgestochen wurde. Oft
hat er die Frau auch weggeschickt, weil sie ihn angelogen oder
betrogen hat. Nun, da er seine Peinigerin los ist,
müßte er eigentlich glücklich sein...
aber das ist er nicht,
denn ohne Frau ist er kein Mann.
***
Tra i libri che ho letto di recente, Se
questo è un uomo del torinese Primo Levi
è senza dubbio quello che mi ha interessato maggiormente.
In questo diario delle sue terribili esperienze, Levi ci descrive
con grande forza espressiva il dramma di migliaia di persone,
costrette dalla follia e dalla perversione, a subire le più disumane
umiliazioni e sofferenze.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer :
Wer bin ich ?
Bin ich das wirklich, was andere von mir sagen ?
Oder bin ich nur das, was ich selbst von mir weiß ?