Is tango macho ?
Tango
is a very complicated dance, it tries to have two embracing bodies accomplish
figures.
In tango, two minds, not one, achieve fluid movement, so that each leg
and each hand fits into what the other legs and hands are doing in order
for the two to function as a single body. One body, two people and moreover,
the opposite sex...
So, two beings as different as a man and a woman, who often have never
before met, embrace one another and dance to the rhythm of the music,
creating a beautiful dance.
To be able to dance tangos the dancers must complement one another, they
must cooperate with one another. If they compete, if they fail to collaborate,
it is impossible for them to dance, or at least to dance well.
Thus, tango begins with an agreement between the dancers that the man
will lead. The two dancers coordinate and cooperate with each other
without losing their difference. Each dancer achieves something different.
And therein lies each one's position in the dance. What defines each
position is its technique and the task it perfoms, which are both necessary
for the dance to happen.
However, tango is a game like chess, in which each
piece moves according to standardized rules. A rook, for example, moves
at right angles, while a bishop moves diagonally. But both pieces, and
all the others, are necessary for the game to be played... and leading
is not the same as winning !
Similarly, to dance tango argentino and to enjoy doing so, each dancer has to
try to follow the rules pertaining to his or her position in the dance.
Thus, I am privileging the structure of the dance in this analysis,
and not the passions and emotions that circulate in that structure.
I believe that the passions and emotions are a consequence, an effect
of the game.
Playing the game well is a passion. Eric Berne, speaking of stimulus-hunger,
says that the most favoured forms of stimuli are those provided by physical
intimacy, ...and what is a close embrace ? No, we only do it for the
technique !
So, a good female milonga dancer knows how to let herself be led. She
accepts the invitation of a tanguero who dances well and she enjoys dancing
with him. Thanks to his sensitivity, his presence, and his confidence,
she can display her own style. If a woman lets a man express himself,
and the man lets the woman express herself, then they will both find
in tango an opportunity to be creative.
The dark side coexists in the lightest pieces
Nearly all live performances today desperately try to be replicas
(of fine recordings). And a fine recording by the current standard means
something that is relatively sympathetic, but flawless, smooth, and
straightforward, that does not breach any confidences, has no real conceits,
no dark sides, vulgarities, or metaphors -- everything that makes art
interesting. It isn't really fun to go to a performance where you are
assured that it is going to be flawless. Perfection, as Schoenberg pointed
out, is not a category of making music. Performances have to have some
danger. Baudelaire: "In everything beautiful there is something
strange." Performances must have things that are surprising and
dark.
Ludwig Van Beethoven's driving music and its
association with dark fate has fascinated listeners for centuries. In
Beethoven's music, things are set up and then when you're not looking,
here comes a left hook. He trips you with his judo technique. It may
be conspicuous or it may be very covert, but the surprises are the tissue
of the music, and without them the music would be stationary, ordinary.
Surprises are built into the texture, but in such a
way that they seem absolutely necessary. Beethoven acknowledged his
own dark side. "Next to love, the best things in life are surprises",
he said. While Beethoven's earlier pieces being light entertainment
are no more challenging then the pop music of today for its audiences.
By the time we get to the five movements of "String Quartet No
15 in A minor, Op.132 ", the increased complexity of the music
becomes obvious. We've travelled the equivalent distance of moving from
cheap sentimentality to the real emotion of Sylvia Plath's intensity.
Plato said, "There are no serious things without laughable things."
Dark and funny, mischievous and burlesque -- all of those qualities are
there in Beethoven. It's the vast range and variety of characters in the
music that makes him another Shakespeare. The first movement of Op. 90 is
immensely dark. The "Appassionata" is tormented, grieving, and
desolate. In Liszt, love and
diabolism make a natural dichotomy. While Don Juan is an erotic force, Liszt
seizes on his innate diabolism as a source of inspiration, recalling that
it is for blasphemy that Don Juan is dragged to Hell by the ghost of the
man he slew in a duel of honor and outrage. There are examples all over -- and in the tissue and grain of
the music, even the happy music. But then, Mozart has a very dark side,
too. And the dark side coexists in the lightest pieces.
|
Daddy
by: Sylvia Plath
You do not do, you do not do
Any more, black shoe
In which I have lived like a foot
For thirty years, poor and white,
Barely daring to breathe or Achoo.
Daddy, I have had to kill you.
You died before I had time--
Marble-heavy, a bag full of God,
Ghastly statue with one gray toe
Big as a Frisco seal
And a head in the freakish Atlantic
Where it pours bean green over blue
In the waters off beautiful Nauset.
I used to pray to recover you.
Ach, du.
In the German tongue, in the Polish town
Scraped flat by the roller
Of wars, wars, wars.
But the name of the town is common.
My Polack friend
Says there are a dozen or two.
So I never could tell where you
Put your foot, your root,
I never could talk to you.
The tongue stuck in my jaw.
It stuck in a barb wire snare.
Ich, ich, ich, ich,
I could hardly speak.
I thought every German was you.
And the language obscene
An engine, an engine
Chuffing me off like a Jew.
A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belsen.
I began to talk like a Jew.
I think I may well be a Jew.
The snows of the Tyrol, the clear beer of Vienna
Are not very pure or true.
With my gipsy ancestress and my weird luck
And my Taroc pack and my Taroc pack
I may be a bit of a Jew.
I have always been scared of you,
With your Luftwaffe, your gobbledygoo.
And your neat mustache
And your Aryan eye, bright blue.
Panzer-man, panzer-man, O You--
Not God but a swastika
So black no sky could squeak through.
Every woman adores a Fascist,
The boot in the face, the brute
Brute heart of a brute like you.
You stand at the blackboard, daddy,
In the picture I have of you,
A cleft in your chin instead of your foot
But no less a devil for that, no not
Any less the black man who
Bit my pretty red heart in two.
I was ten when they buried you.
At twenty I tried to die
And get back, back, back to you.
I thought even the bones would do.
But they pulled me out of the sack,
And they stuck me together with glue.
And then I knew what to do.
I made a model of you,
A man in black with a Meinkampf look
And a love of the rack and the screw.
And I said I do, I do.
So daddy, I'm finally through.
The black telephone's off at the root,
The voices just can't worm through.
If I've killed one man, I've killed two--
The vampire who said he was you
And drank my blood for a year,
Seven years, if you want to know.
Daddy, you can lie back now.
There's a stake in your fat black heart
And the villagers never liked you.
They are dancing and stamping on you.
They always knew it was you.
Daddy, daddy, you bastard, I'm through.
|
Criticizing
"Daddy" - Sylvia Plath Poems
The title of "Daddy" means relationship between father and girl. Plath
wrote this poem when she divorced her husband, so there are three people
- Plath, her father and her husband in this poem. For example, in the
ninth stanza 'If I've killed one man, I've killed two' means her father
and her husband. This poem may mean relationship between woman and man
or the weak and the strong.
In the second stanza 'Daddy, I have had to kill you. You died before
I had time-', her father forsook her by his death. In this poem 'God,
Luftwaffe, black man and devil' mean her father. He was very big and
very strong in her mind. She could not escape FROM him. She hated him,
but she loved him. In the seventh stanza 'At twenty I tried to die and
get back, back, back to you' SHOW me it. She was very shocked by his
death. It is may be that she wrote this poem to get over her sorrow
and anger or release FROM him.
A conclusion, she tried to kill her father and her husband to release
FROM strong them in her mind. But in sixth stanza 'Every woman adores
a Fascist' mean that she loves them. I think she wants to be strong
like them. In final stanza 'I'm through'means two things. One meaning
is finishing revenge against her father's death. Another meaning is
death of Plath. She needed her death to release FROM them. Women...
Reference books:
Noriko Nagata, "Derangement in a mirror"
Chouzou Tokunaga, "Sylvia Plath Poems"
|
Sylvia
Plath once said about this poem:
The speaker in this poem is a daughter who has an Electra complex.
Her father died while she believed him as the God. Her circumstances
are complicated. This is because her father is a member of Nazi and
surely her mother has Jewish blood in her vein.
I don’t know how I can receive her explanation, but I think it is
all right to take her biographic fact in consideration to some extent
in interpreting this poem.
The poem begins with a series of metaphors about Plath’s father. They
are, for example, shoe -statue - foot -root - , which means her love
to him like the God, but gradually the metaphors comes to mean her
hate to him like the Satan. They are, for example, a brute,a devil.
Near the end, a new metaphor comes out. It is about her husband, Ted
Hughes, for instance vampire.
What on earth does this mean?
|