Daguerreotype
(1839 - 1860) |
|
(1839
- 1860) Daguerreotype. |
The
Daguerreotype was
the first practical & commercially available
photographic process to be publicly announced.
This 'One-off' process
is named after his French inventor Louis
Jacques Mandé Daguerre.
Daguerreotypes are regularly presented in the
tradition of miniature paintings, using similar
frames & etuis, resulting in a strong
resemblance with painted miniature portraits,
especially when they where hand-colored.
This process involved the deposit of a thin layer
of pure silver onto a copper
plate, which was then exposed to iodine
vapour, resulting in the creation of a thin layer
of light sensitive-silver iodide on the surface
of the plate.
After exposure of the plate in the camera, the
image was developed in fumes
of mercury, which formed a white amalgam
of silver and mercury on those parts of the image
which had been exposed to light.
The plate was then stabilised or 'fixed' and mounted
behind glass in order to protect the delicate
surface from abrasion and chemical contamination.
While the daguerreotype produced an image of startling
precision and often great beauty, its inherent
disadvantages led to its demise in the late 1850s.
First, the image was literally a mirror
image, laterally reversed, and in addition,
its bright reflective surface was difficult to
view in certain lights.
But the fatal drawback was the fact that every
daguerreotype was a unique
image: if more copies were required, it
was necessary to make further exposures. |
|
|
However, even in the post-daguerrean period, these
'jewelry like' images
kept their unparalleled optical quality, sharpness
and consequently, their popularity.
With thanks to
Michael
Gray for permission
to use parts of his text. |
|
Calotype
- Talbottype (1839 - 1855) |
|
(1839
- 1855) Calotype - Talbottype. |
|
|
Talbot
had made the most important of the discoveries
which formed the basis of his Calotype, negative/positive
photographic process: this was the developing-out
of the latent or invisible image formed in the
camera on a sheet of paper coated with light-sensitive
silver iodide.
This developed negative was then chemically 'fixed'
to remove unexposed and undeveloped silver compounds
and thus stabilise the image. From this negative,
positive images could be made using the salt
print process.
This involved floating or submerging good quality
drawing paper in a bath of sodium chloride which
after drying was then refloated in a bath of silver
nitrate: this resulted in the formation of light-sensitive
silver chloride in the top surface of the paper.
This was then mounted in a frame in contact with
the paper negative and exposed, or 'printed out',
in sunlight until the required density of image
was attained. No further chemical development
was necessary: the positive image is made visible
using the sun's power alone to reduce the silver
salts to their pure metallic state.
Although, the beginning
of modern photography, the calotype never
reached the popularity of the daguerreotype process.
Today however (and so for many pioneer amateur
photographers such as Julia Margaret Cameron)
the poor image sharpness is one of the most appreciated
quality's of these early paper photographs.
With thanks to
Michael
Gray for permission
to use parts of his text. |
The
first 'Negative/Positive'
paper process named after his English inventor
William Henry Fox Talbot.
The paper processes which were ultimately destined
to provide the foundations
of modern photographic practice (only recently
challenged by digital photography) were originally
more imperfect than the daguerreotype in terms
of sharpness, but they possessed a number of factors
which in the end gave them a critical advantage. |
|
Albumin
print (1850 - 1900) |
|
(1850
- 1900) Albumin print. |
'Negative/Positive'
process attributed to the French inventor Blanquart-Evrard
in 1850.
The Albumen Print Process
superseded Talbot’s calotype process, so the albumen
print started to displace the salt print in the
mid-1850s, and had largely ousted it by the early
1860s.
Its introduction is generally attributed to the
Frenchman Louis-Desiré Blanquart-Evrard.
Although both types of prints belong to the same
generic group, the albumen print is most often
characterised by having a deep gloss finish.
From the 1850s up to the late 1890s, when it started
to be replaced by a variety of papers which were
capable of being produced by automated systems,
the overwhelming majority of photographic prints
were produced on albumen paper.
The treatment of Gold toning improved the reddish
look of albumine prints into, with 19th.
Century often associated, sepia
color.
The albumin print was used for most of photography's
popular applications such as the Carte-de
Visite & Cabinet
photographs, stereo-photographs,
large format topographical
views from all over the world, etc.
The albumin print became the most popular photo
process in the 19th.
Century. However, industrial produced, gelatine
based papers started to oust the albumin prints
round 1880. |
|
|
With
thanks to Michael
Gray for permission
to use parts of his text. |
|
Ambrotype
(1851 - 1870) |
|
(1851
- 1870) Ambrotype. |
|
|
'One-off'
process using the technique of the wet collodion
negative. Ambrotypes are underexposed collodion
negatives presenting themselves as 'one-off' positive
images when seen on a dark background.
James Ambrose Cutting
patented this utilization (1854) of the collodion
negative invented by Frederick
Scott Archer (1851)
Due to presentation in similar frames &
etuis, the ambrotype shows resemblance with
daguerreotypes although it cannot be confused
with the latter since the surface is not reflective.
The ambrotype was cheaper compared to the daguerreotype.
Although exceptions are seen, in general the ambrotype
image quality is more duller compared to the glossy
and high reflective surface of the daguerreotype.
Similar to daguerreotypes, many ambrotypes where
finely coloured by hand as a result of a long
tradition of miniature painting. |
|
Carbon
print (1864 - 1920) |
|
(1864
- 1920) Carbon print. |
Although
the most common 'non-silver'
process, the Carbon print is not a true photograph
due to the absence of silver.
The idea of the carbon image, L.
Poitvin (1855), was improved by J.
W. Swan in 1864.
The carbon print uses pigment in a gelatine based
layer and therefore the image is very stable and
almost free of fading true time and exposure to
light.
Such as the albumin print, the carbon print was
often used for the production of Carte-de-Visite
and Cabinet photographs.
Since a carbon print replaces silver by pigments,
many different colours can be used. Mostly a darker
sepia or warm black is chosen. |
|
|
|
| Ferrotype
- Tintype (1853 - 1920) - till 1950 |
|
(1853
- 1920) - till 1950 Ferrotype - Tintype. |
|
|
'One-off'
process using the technique of the wet collodion
negative process on a tin plate. Therefore, tintypes,
similar to Ambrotypes, are always seen as positive
images.
The tintype was invented by Adolphe
Alexandre Martin in 1853. The tintype was
cheaper compared to the ambrotype.
When presented in frames or etuis, the tintype
shows resemblance with the ambrotype, however,
the former is more often presented in paper passe-partout
or glass passe-partout only. Or without any embellishment.
Since tintypes where fast and cheap to produce,
the process became popular on fairground and other
popular places of entertainments.
A typical folk-art tradition, especially in the
U.S.A. is the hand coloring of large format tintypes
as can be seen in the 'full-plate' image on the
left. A variant of the tintype is exposed on tissue
or wood and know as the Pannotype. |
|
| Autochrome
(1907 - 1935) |
|
(1907
- 1935) Autochrome. |
Without
doubt, the most beautiful color process ever invented,
the autochrome (Brothers
Lumière, 1907) was the first commercially
available 'true color'
process.
Since the Lumiére brothers made the autochrome
available in June 1907, photographers began
worldwide experimenting with the new process.
The autochrome's basic principle was the creation
of a color experience by addition, opposite of
techniques that produced colors through substraction.
The various colour grains where made of dyed
potato starch spread
onto the glassplates. Their disadvantage of a
visible grain structure became one of their greatest
advantages when used in the hands of pictorial
photographers.
Autochromes are dark but translucent images. They
could be projected but are best viewed via back-lighting
in a viewing device known as
Diascope.
These early color images are most sensitive too
fading and should therefore only be exposed to
light during short viewing sessions.
In spite of their vulnerability numerous well
preserved autochrome collections do exist worldwide.
A high quality Belgian collection is preserved
by Florent
Van Hoof. |
|

Collection Florent Van Hoof |
|
Cyanotype
(round 1845) |
|
(round
1845) Cyanotype. |
|
|
Early
'non-silver' process
invented by Sir John Herschel
in 1842. The typical 'Berlin
blue' of a cyanotype was the chemical result
after the mixture of two iron salts resulting
in a stable blue color.
Cyanotypes usually show the same size as the negative
that was used. Because of the poor sensitivity
to light, contact printing
was the best 'workable' option.
Although the latter disadvantage, beautiful artistic
cyanotypes are often seen. Further, the process
was regularly used for printing stereo
photographs. |
|
| Crystoleum
(round 1880 - 1895) |
|
(round
1880 - 1895) Crystoleum.
|
A
Crystoleum is an
albumin print, glued face down & stuck on
the inside of a curved glass. Then the paper backing
was virtually rubbed away so that colours could
be applied on the rear-side but shining through
the paper and glass on the front-side.
An oil was used to make the print translucent
and oil colours where added from behind to colour
and ameliorate the image.
Often a second glass was stuck behind the first
on which the broad areas of colour where painted.
The above resulted in a softly & smooth colour
effect. This technique was often used to reproduce
romantic illustrations in a coloured version,
kitsch but nice.
Portraits from life and soft erotic images are
also seen in this charming technique, unfortunately
often neglected by many collectors. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|