Heroic images or NASA fraud? At last we have the conclusive
proof! The image on the left clearly shows the supposed 25,000 of thrust
generated by the lunar lander to arrest its descent. Yet in the image on
the right, where is the giant crater this would have created? Looks like
the complex web of NASA lies is about to unravel!
Another apparently inspirational image from the NASA
archive. All seems fine at first but notice the numerous directions in
which the shadows are falling (marked with arrows). This indicates that
the image is probably composed of several images taken at different times
(probably in a top secret studio guarded by specially trained aliens
working as government agents) and joined together using advanced
technology NASA always denies existed at the time.
This is the
photographic equivalent of an automotive "cut-and-shut" job. If this image
was your car, you wouldn't trust it to take you to the end of your road
without breaking in half!
Not much wrong with this picture you may think. Yet, by
thinking that, you would just become yet another of NASA's conspiracy
Firstly, despite the absence of an atmosphere, no stars
can be seen in the sky.
Secondly, the interior of the shopping
basket can clearly be seen when all areas in shadow should be pitch black
due to the absence of air molecules.
Nice try NASA, but we are not
fooled that easily!
Just way too many things wrong with this
Notice the absence of stars again. The arrows
indicate the various directions in which shadows are falling, again
showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination. Yet there is
something even more obviously wrong with this picture.
length of the lower support column of the lunar lander was 4 feet tall,
this would indicate that the astronaut was over 8 feet tall, which none of
the astronauts were.
Another careless mistake from NASA.
Oh yes NASA, it's all very well adding stars on this
picture just to make us realise how wrong we have been. We are not fooled
If we look a bit more closely, we spot the constellation
of Pegasus with the planet Saturn (marked S1) clearly visible in the top
left corner. Yet at the time of the mission, although Saturn appeared to
be near Pegasus from Earth, from the Moon it would have appeared to
be in a completely different position (marked S2).
It is almost
insulting to think that NASA could get away with this obvious
Well, with this image where does one
Inconsistent shadows, too much ambient light and incorrect
planetary positioning in the sky are all evident here.
how the focal length of the camera lens has changed compared to the
pictures above, even though the astronauts' Hasselblad cameras were only
fitted with a single type of prime lens.
Just how stupid did the
NASA officials think the public were?
<email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> I also have some questions:
> 1) Why is there no visible stars in the picures of the astronauts on
> the moon?
Because they forgot to attach the christmas lights to the ceiling of
the dome where everything was faked.
> 2) Is there any picture of Earth from the moon? If not, why not? It
> would be the first thing I would take picture of.
Because you can't make a picture of the earth when you're inside
a dome on earth.
> 3) They left flags, why can't we see them? Why they don't used the
> Hubble telescope to take a picture of the flag(s)?
Because the Hubble telescope can't look into the dome.
Besides, the dome has been demolished to get rid of all the evidence.
That's why they're not landing on the moon anymore these days.
They're constructing a dome for Mars now, with a pink ceiling
and without a need for christmas lights or pictures of the earth.