"YBM" <ybmess@nooos.fr> wrote in message news:44619bd3$0$30081$636a55ce@news.free.fr...  Hexenmeister a icrit :  > According to Dork, "implies" is a binary operator, not a decision and it  > denies causality.   According to the disgusting coward Androcles (so called "electrical  engineer") => aka "Implies" is not a binary operator.   If you don't believe people here, why don't you read MathWorld :  http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Implies.html ("=> is a binary operator") Which says : "Implies" is the connective in propositional calculus which has the meaning "if A is true, then B is also true." false xor false = true false or false = false "xor implies or"  Dork the fucking lunatic. "true implies false" => "If true = true then false = true" Read what is says after "=> is a binary operator". Fuck off, selfcontradictory cowardly moronic cunt. Androcles 

Fumble Index  Original post & context: BMq8g.255450$8Q3.135169@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk 
See also 
