"Brian Kennelly" <bwkennelly@cox.net> wrote in message
news:r7p0h.5255$%l3.1408@newsfe13.phx...
| Androcles wrote:
| > C'mon, local village dog tord, give me another fumble for
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/XorOr.gif )
| > "xor" implies "and", I've got all three lights on. Right, Dork Van de
| > psycho?
|
| That one is almost too easy. Your circuit is giving NOT XOR,
| you need to cross the wires between the switches.
Well done.
"xor implies or" -- Dork Van de psycho.
Hence:
[1 xor 1] implies [1 or 1]
therefore 0 implies 1
Who is the shithead?
Androcles
|